Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 06:12
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Teen TikTok skin care craze may be harmful — and expensive, study finds - CNN
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s your idea of the perfect Saturday night?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
When does a woman know she is cumming?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Do Republicans want to ban books and decide what your kids can and can’t read?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How do I become an intelligent man?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Prescription risk: Meds that could cause dementia - WFMZ.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump gets back behind raids in immigration whiplash - Axios
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.